What are the rights of ECHR?

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) stands as a pivotal document in the landscape of international law, championing the cause of human rights since its inception in 1950. Among its various provisions, the concept of ‘absolute rights’ forms the bedrock of the Convention, embodying principles that are fundamental to human dignity and liberty.

Absolute rights, as enshrined in the ECHR, are those rights that hold an unqualified status, meaning they must be upheld under all circumstances, without exception. These rights are distinct from ‘qualified’ or ‘limited’ rights, which may be subject to lawful restrictions under certain conditions.

This article delves deep into the essence of absolute rights within the framework of the ECHR. It explores their historical development, provides a detailed examination of key absolute rights, analyzes landmark cases, and discusses the challenges and contemporary issues surrounding these rights. By understanding the nature and scope of absolute rights, we gain insight into their critical role in shaping a just and humane society, and the ongoing efforts to protect these inalienable aspects of human existence under the European human rights regime.

Historical Context and Development of Absolute Rights

Origins of the ECHR

The European Convention on Human Rights was established in the aftermath of World War II, a period marked by egregious violations of human dignity. In this context, the Council of Europe was formed, leading to the creation of the ECHR in 1950. The Convention aimed to prevent the recurrence of such atrocities and to promote a culture of respect for human rights.

Evolution of Human Rights Concepts

Over the decades, the understanding and interpretation of human rights have evolved. The ECHR, initially a response to the horrors of war, has adapted to changing societal values and challenges, while the core concept of absolute rights remains steadfast.

Understanding Absolute Rights

Definition and Characteristics

Absolute rights are non-derogable and must be upheld under all circumstances. Unlike other rights, they cannot be suspended even in times of war or public emergency. These rights are inherent to all human beings and are essential for their dignity and integrity.

Distinction from Other Rights

Qualified rights, such as the right to respect for private and family life, can be restricted under specific conditions. Limited rights, like the freedom of assembly, can be subject to lawful restrictions. However, absolute rights, like the right to life, are unyielding and must be preserved without exception.

Key Absolute Rights in the ECHR

Right to Life (Article 2)

The right to life is a fundamental principle of the ECHR. It mandates that life must be protected by law, and deprivation of life is permissible only in very specific and extreme circumstances, such as self-defense.

Prohibition of Torture (Article 3)

Article 3 of the ECHR strictly prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. This absolute right underscores the commitment to protecting individuals from severe abuses and cruel practices.

Prohibition of Slavery (Article 4)

This right ensures that no one shall be held in slavery or servitude. It is absolute and uncompromising, reflecting a universal moral consensus against these practices.

No Punishment Without Law (Article 7)

Article 7 ensures that no one can be guilty of a criminal offense for an action that was not criminal at the time it was committed. It upholds the principle of legality in criminal law.

Case Studies and Landmark Judgments

Illustrative Cases

Each absolute right in the ECHR has been clarified and enforced through landmark cases. For instance, the case of “Soering v. United Kingdom” significantly impacted the interpretation of Article 3, especially concerning extradition and the risk of torture.

Impact on Human Rights Law

These cases have not only provided clarity on the scope of absolute rights but also influenced national legislation and judicial practices across Europe, reinforcing the protection of fundamental human rights.

Challenges and Controversies

Ethical and Legal Dilemmas

The application of absolute rights, especially the right to life, often presents ethical challenges, such as in cases of euthanasia or assisted suicide. Balancing these rights with other societal needs and values can be complex.

Balancing State Security and Absolute Rights

In the context of terrorism and national security, there is a continuous debate on how to uphold absolute rights while effectively addressing security threats.

Comparison with Other Human Rights Instruments

UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The ECHR shares many principles with the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights but focuses specifically on the protection of rights within the European context.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

This international treaty also enshrines many of the same rights as the ECHR, with a global scope.

Role of the European Court of Human Rights

Enforcement of Absolute Rights

The ECtHR is instrumental in interpreting and enforcing the provisions of the ECHR, particularly absolute rights. The Court’s judgments ensure that states adhere to their human rights obligations.

Notable Judgments

Cases like “Chahal v. United Kingdom” highlight the Court’s role in upholding absolute rights, even in challenging circumstances involving national security.

Contemporary Issues and the Future of Absolute Rights

Emerging Challenges

In the digital age, issues like privacy and data protection pose new challenges to absolute rights, necessitating a contemporary interpretation and application.

Future of Human Rights Protection

The ECHR and its absolute rights remain dynamic, evolving with societal changes and technological advancements, ensuring the continued protection of fundamental human rights.


The European Convention on Human Rights, with its emphasis on absolute rights, is a testament to Europe’s commitment to human dignity and freedom. Understanding these rights is crucial for legal professionals and policymakers. As society evolves, so too will the interpretation and application of these rights, ensuring that they remain relevant and robust in safeguarding human values and integrity. Also we are ECHR lawyers that can help with different issues.

Iryna Berenstein
Associated Partner
Mrs. Berenstein is a distinguished and outstanding lawyer with profound experience and exceptional legal knowledge in the field of International Private Law, Financial Law, Corporate Law, investment regulation, Compliance, Data Protection, and Reputation Management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the European Court of Human Rights?
Established in 1959 and located in Strasbourg, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) reviews claims of violations of civil and political rights stipulated in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and its protocols by member states.
Does the ECHR have any power?
The court has no enforcement authority, and some states have disregarded its verdicts on human rights violations.
Which countries ignore ECHR?
In 2022, the Court found the UK in violation of an ECHR right in two judgments, tying with Austria, Estonia, and San Marino for the 13th lowest among 47 states, excluding Russia.
Is the ECHR International?
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an international treaty among Council of Europe States, drafted and initially ratified by the United Kingdom in 1951.
What are the powers of the ECHR?
The European Court of Human Rights enforces the European Convention on Human Rights by reviewing complaints, known as "applications," from individuals or states to ensure member states uphold the rights and guarantees of the Convention.